Premium

Premium, and its escalation super-premium, are unregulated marketing terms that carry no defined composition requirement and guarantee nothing about nutritional quality. This is the single most important fact about them: in neither the US nor the EU is there any legal threshold a food must clear before calling itself premium, so the word imposes no minimum on protein quality, digestibility, ingredient sourcing, or formulation rigour (Regulation (EC) 767/2009; AAFCO, 2024). A budget product and a genuinely excellent one can both, lawfully, use the label. That does not make the term meaningless in practice, because reputable manufacturers often do reserve it for their better recipes, but it shifts the burden onto the buyer to verify rather than trust. The dependable signals lie elsewhere: whether the product is a [complete food](/glossary/complete-food) for the correct [life stage](/glossary/life-stage), what the [ingredient order](/glossary/ingredient-order) and [analytical constituents](/glossary/analytical-constituents) actually show, and whether the maker meets the [WSAVA](/glossary/wsava) manufacturer criteria such as employing a qualified nutritionist and running [feeding trials](/glossary/feeding-trial). It is the same lesson as the [natural](/glossary/natural) claim: an evocative adjective is not evidence. For a discerning reader, premium is best treated as a prompt to look harder at the verifiable label data, not as a conclusion. See the [Petipedia glossary](/glossary) for how to read past marketing language.

Petipedia · Editorial team

General documentary information. For an individual animal, a veterinarian's advice takes precedence over any online content.